• Skip to main content
itrc_logo

Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soil: Considerations for Human Health Risk Assessment

Home
About ITRC
Navigating this Website
1 Introduction
1 Introduction Overview
1.1 Using Bioavailability Information
1.2 Background
1.3 Definition of Terms
2 Regulatory Background
2 Regulatory Background Overview
2.1 Current Practices: Survey of State Regulators
3 Technical Background
3 Technical Background Overview
3.1 Soil Mineral Phases
3.2 Soil pH, Organic Matter, and Reactive Clay Minerals
3.3 Soil Particle Size
4 Decision Process
4 Decision Process Overview
4.1 Decision Process Flowchart
4.2 Is there a Method Available?
4.3 Could Bioavailability Assessment Affect the Remedial Decisions?
4.4 Do the Benefits of Bioavailability Assessment Justify the Costs?
4.5 Further Considerations
5 Methodology
5 Methodology for Evaluating Contaminant Oral Bioavailability Overview
5.1 In Vivo Approach
5.2 In Vitro Approach
6 Lead
6 Lead Overview
6.1 Fate and Transport
6.2 Toxicology and Exposure
6.3 Methodology for Quantifying RBA of Lead in Soil
6.4 When Does a Bioavailability Study Make Sense?
6.5 Case Studies
6.6 Using Bioavailability Methods to Evaluate Remedies (Bioavailability-Based Remediation)
7 Arsenic
7 Arsenic Overview
7.1 Fate and Transport
7.2 Toxicology and Exposure
7.3 Methodology for Evaluating Arsenic Bioavailability
7.4 When Does It Make Sense to Use Bioavailability?
7.5 Case Studies
7.6 Using Bioavailability Methods to Evaluate Remedies (Bioavailability Based Remediation)
8 PAHs
8 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Overview
8.1 PAH Sources and Exposure
8.2 General Toxicity of PAHs
8.3 Influences of Soil on Bioavailability of PAH
8.4 Methodology for Evaluating PAH Bioavailability
8.5 Dermal Absorption
8.6 Amendment Strategies and Permanence of Bioavailability
8.7 Case Study
9 Risk Assessment
9 Using Bioavailability Information in Risk Assessment Overview
9.1 Risk Calculations
9.2 Other Considerations and Limitations
10 Stakeholder Perspectives
10 Stakeholder Perspectives Overview
10.1 Stakeholder Concerns
10.2 Specific Tribal Stakeholder Concerns
10.3 Stakeholder Engagement
11 Case Studies
11 Case Studies Overview
11.1 Arsenic, Mining, CA
11.2 Arsenic, Pesticide, AR
11.3 Arsenic, Naturally occurring, UT
11.4 Arsenic, Smelter, AZ
11.5 Arsenic-contaminated tailings, OR
11.6 Lead, Industrial, Midwest US
11.7 PAH, Skeet targets, TX
11.8 Arsenic, Copper precipitation, UT
11.9 Arsenic, CCA wood preservative, CA
11.10 Arsenic, MGP coal ash, MI
11.11 Lead, Mining MT
11.12 Lead, Mining, MT
11.13 Lead, Smelter, UT
Additional Information
Review Checklist
Appendix A: Detailed Survey Responses
Appendix B: Chemical Reactions of Metals
Acronyms
Glossary
Acknowledgments
Team Contacts
Document Feedback

 

Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soil
HOME

8.3 Influences of Soil on Bioavailability of PAH

Bioavailability of PAHs in soil is thought to be largely related to the partitioning of PAHs within the soil matrix, although in some recent studies partitioning alone could not explain differences in PAH uptake in swine orally exposed to different soils (James et al. 2016; Peters, Wickstrom, and Siciliano 2016). PAH partitioning in soils is dictated by the chemical and physical characteristics of the source of PAHs, chemical and physical properties of the soil matrix, and age of the release of PAHs to the environment.

▼Read more

Several soil characteristics (for example, organic carbon or clay content) may affect PAH bioavailability, although the PAH source and the presence of black carbon (such as soot or char) in the soil will generally be the main factors controlling PAH partitioning (Roberts et al. 2016). Certain PAH sources (for example, soot, chars, coal, coke, and coal tar-based clay targets at skeet range sites) have been shown to strongly sorb PAHs and, therefore, are more likely to result in reduced bioavailability (Xia, Gomez-Eyles, and Ghosh 2016). SERDP recently sponsored research to asses these factors (Lowney et al. 2017). Sites affected by these sources and with high black carbon contents are therefore good candidates for bioavailability investigations. PAH bioavailability also tends to decrease with time as the more bioavailable PAHs are degraded/volatilized, and the remaining PAHs become increasingly sorbed within the soil matrix.

8.3.1 Contamination Source and Matrix

The source of PAHs must be considered when determining whether bioavailability assessments are likely to benefit risk management decisions. PAH source materials provide a matrix that can affect bioavailability. For example, PAHs released within black carbon type sources such as soot, chars, coal, or coke are associated with reduced bioavailability due to sorption. Nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) sources such as petroleum products, fuel residues, creosote, or coal tar may also be associated with reduced bioavailability, but to a lesser degree (Ruby et al. 1996).

▼Read more

Soot and chars are the remnants of incomplete combustion and are commonly termed “black carbon.” These solid phases offer strong sorption sites for PAHs. Studies indicate that PAHs may have an affinity for black carbon that is several orders of magnitude greater than reported for natural organic matter (Cornelissen et al. 2005). Additionally, solid PAH source materials, such as soot and coal tar from clay target fragments, have a larger influence on the partitioning of PAHs than other soil properties, such as organic carbon or clay content (Xia, Gomez-Eyles, and Ghosh 2016). This increased partitioning by soot and coal tar is reflected in decreased dermal absorption in excised pig skin. Dermal and oral bioavailability studies using soils affected by clay target fragments (USACE 2016) and lampblack soot (Stroo et al. 2005) also report reduced dermal absorption, reduced gastrointestinal (GI) absorption relative to freshly spiked soil samples, or both—further confirming that source material must be considered when evaluating potential bioavailability of PAHs in soil.

8.3.2 Geochemical and Physical Properties of Soil

Much research is available on the properties and sorptive capacities of soils and sediments as geosorbents for hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs), including PAHs. Soil properties generally have less impact on PAH bioavailability than the source characteristics, but the inorganic and especially organic materials in soils and sediments also can have a significant effect.  Generally, properties that control the sorptive capacity for hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) are the most important properties to consider.

▼Read more

Since bioavailability of HOCs in soil is largely related to solubility, most research into the potential effects on bioavailability of HOCs from various soil properties is based on studying partitioning kinetics of HOCs from the stationary phase of the soil matrix into the aqueous phase. After the effects of PAH source material, soil characteristics including black carbon, organic carbon (OC), and clay mineral content are likely to have the most significant effect on PAH bioavailability. Other soil characteristics, such as pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and aerobic/anaerobic conditions, may also affect bioavailability of PAHs in soils and sediments to a lesser extent (Chung and Alexander 2002; Luo et al. 2012). Figure 8-1 illustrates PAH availability for oral or dermal absorption as a function of PAH source materials and soil chemistry.

Figure 8‑1. PAH availability for oral or dermal absorption as a function of PAH source materials and soil chemistry.
Source: Reprinted with permission from (Ruby, M.V., Y.W. Lowney, A.L. Bunge, S.M. Roberts, J.L. Gomez-Eyles, U. Ghosh, J. Kissel, P. Tomlinson, and C.A. Menzie. “Oral Bioavailability, Bioaccessibility, and Dermal Absorption of PAHs from Soil – State of the Science.” Environmental Science & Technology 50, no. 5 (2016): 2151-64. Figure 1), Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

8.3.2.1 Soil Organic Carbon Read More

In soils, organic carbon (OC) principally comes from detritus material and its degradation products, as well as kerogen, coal, soot, and charcoal (NRC 2003). Many studies demonstrate that the amount of OC in soil and its composition affect the bioavailability of HOCs. In these studies, OC is usually divided into components based on the structure and stability of the OC. OC can be broadly divided into amorphous OC and black carbon. HOC sorption in the soil environment can be broadly described as a combination of sorption to these two phases (Accardi-Dey and Gschwend 2002).

Amorphous OC includes macromolecules, fulvic/humic acids, and humins, and shows linear, noncompetitive absorption of HOCs (Cornelissen et al. 2005). Amorphous OC is characterized as having low desorption activation energy for HOCs, allowing rapid HOC desorption (Ghosh, Talley, and Luthy 2001).

Black carbons (such as soot, char, or coke) show extensive, nonlinear, and competitive adsorption of HOCs (Cornelissen et al. 2005). HOCs adsorbed to black carbons have high desorption activation energies and slow desorption rates (Ghosh, Talley, and Luthy 2001). PAHs adsorbed onto black carbons are therefore expected to be less bioavailable to humans following incidental ingestion or dermal exposure.

8.3.2.2 Clay Mineral Content Read More

Soil aggregates consist of a variety of particles that include both organic and inorganic components. Although OC is viewed as the principal adsorbent surface for PAHs in soil aggregates, inorganic surfaces associated with clay minerals can also demonstrate adsorptive properties (Luthy et al. 1997; Schultz, Young, and Higashi 1999), especially in soils with low carbon content (Sawhney and Gent 1990). These adsorption properties, however, have low desorption activation energies (Ghosh, Talley, and Luthy 2001). PAHs can therefore be quickly released from mineral surfaces under conditions favoring desorption. PAHs weakly sorbed to the mineral fraction are likely to be more bioavailable for humans following incidental ingestion or dermal exposure.

8.3.3 Effects of Aging Contamination in Soil/Sediment on PAH Bioavailability

PAHs in soil and sediment undergo a weathering process over time that changes the overall chemical composition and can increase the sequestration of PAHs within the soil/sediment media (Alexander 1995, 2000; Northcott and Jones 2001; Luo et al. 2012). With time, PAHs in the rapidly desorbing fraction degrade, volatilize, or slowly diffuse into more sorptive and inaccessible phases within the soil matrix. Thus, the bioavailability and toxicity of PAHs remaining in soil and sediment may decrease over time.

image_pdfPrint this page/section



BCS

web document
glossaryBCS Glossary
referencesBCS References
acronymsBCS Acronyms
ITRC
Contact Us
About ITRC
Visit ITRC
social media iconsClick here to visit ITRC on FacebookClick here to visit ITRC on TwitterClick here to visit ITRC on LinkedInITRC on Social Media
about_itrc
Permission is granted to refer to or quote from this publication with the customary acknowledgment of the source (see suggested citation and disclaimer). This web site is owned by ITRC • 1250 H Street, NW • Suite 850 • Washington, DC 20005 • (202) 266-4933 • Email: [email protected] • Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, and Usage Policy ITRC is sponsored by the Environmental Council of the States.